Resources
WPS Resolution Analysis

UN Security Council Resolution 2242 on Women, Peace and Security

UNSCR 2242 is the WPS agenda's most contested resolution — the first to explicitly link women's participation and protection to counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism, a shift many feminist scholars argue securitised the agenda.

Adopted13 Oct 2015VoteUnanimous (15-0)Main themeWPS & Counter-TerrorismKey instrumentInformal Experts GroupBuilds onUNSCR 2122 (2013)Followed byUNSCR 2467 (2019)
Why was this resolution needed?

By 2015, the global security landscape had shifted dramatically since 1325. The rise of violent extremist groups — Boko Haram in West Africa, Al-Shabaab in the Horn, ISIS in the Middle East — posed new challenges for the WPS agenda. Women were both targets of extremist violence and, in some contexts, participants in extremist movements.

UNSCR 2242 was designed to address these new realities by linking the WPS agenda to counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism. It also established the Informal Experts Group on WPS to provide systematic Council oversight of WPS implementation.

What does it actually say?
Informal Experts Group
Establishes the Informal Experts Group on WPS to enable systematic Council oversight of WPS implementation.
Gender in CT/CVE
Calls for gender to be treated as a cross-cutting issue in counter-terrorism and P/CVE work.
Gender-sensitive data
Calls for gender-sensitive data on drivers of radicalisation among women and the impacts of CT measures on women's organisations.
Civil society funding
Urges increased funding for women's civil society organisations working on peace and security.
What's new — what did it change?

UNSCR 2242 broke with the WPS tradition of focusing solely on conflict settings by explicitly engaging with counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism — an entirely new terrain for the agenda. This was the first WPS resolution to discuss radicalisation, violent extremism, and the role of women in preventing both.

The Informal Experts Group was an institutional innovation designed to give the Council a standing mechanism for WPS oversight — a dedicated space where Council members, UN entities, and civil society could discuss WPS implementation systematically rather than through ad hoc briefings.

Common misconceptions
Myth
UNSCR 2242 simply updated the WPS agenda for the 21st century — linking it to relevant contemporary security threats.
Reality
Many feminist scholars argue that 2242 fundamentally shifted the WPS agenda away from its transformative roots. By linking women's participation to counter-terrorism objectives, the resolution instrumentalised women's security for state security goals. Women's organisations in the Sahel and Horn of Africa have reported that CT-linked WPS programming has subjected them to surveillance and restricted their civic space.
Pillar relevance
Participation
Core — but participation now linked to CT/CVE objectives
Protection
Indirect — CT measures may increase risks for women's organisations
Prevention
Core — prevention now includes preventing violent extremism
Relief & Recovery
Indirect — CT-focused funding shapes recovery priorities
Read the original resolution — UN Document Portal